Jones & Guerrero Company, Inc., a Corporation, Appellant, v. Daiwa Navigation Co., Ltd., Appellee, 356 F.2d 942 (9th Cir. 1966)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the District Court of Guam; Paul D. Shriver, Judge.
Arriola, Bohn & Gayle, John A. Bohn, John J. Carniato, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Barrett, Ferenz & Trapp, Walter S. Ferenz, W. Scott Barrett, Oakland, Cal., for appellee.
Before HAMLEY, KOELSCH, and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Upon an examination of the record we conclude that the trial court's finding that appellant was indebted to appellee was a permissible inference from Plaintiff's Exhibit 1, the Wiseman deposition, and defense counsel's statement at pre-trial conference. The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
