William Epton et al., Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Frank Hogan et al., Respondents-appellees, 355 F.2d 203 (2d Cir. 1966)
Annotate this CaseDecided January 14, 1966
Len Holt, Washington, D. C. (J. A. Jordan, Jr., Norfolk, Va., on the brief), for appellants.
Joel Lewittes, Asst. Atty. Gen. of State of New York (Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of State of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Mortimer Sattler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Iris A. Steel, Deputy Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel), for appellees.
Before WATERMAN, KAUFMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellants' complaint, concerning the alleged unconstitutionality of New York Penal Law § 161 and other statutes, was dismissed with leave to amend. An order dismissing a complaint with leave to amend is not a final order and therefore not appealable. See Oppenheimer v. F. J. Young & Co., Inc., 144 F.2d 387 (2d Cir. 1944); American Broadcasting Co. v. Wahl Co., 121 F.2d 412 (2d Cir. 1941); 6 Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 54.12 [1] at 116 (1953).
Appeal dismissed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
