Abdullah Ahmad Bey et al. v. Francis Muldoon, Alfred Corry and Stewart Sobelman, Trustees and Robert Kelly, Administrator of a Special Fund (2/5/62), et al.abdullah Ahmad Bey, Appellant, 354 F.2d 1005 (3d Cir. 1966)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit - 354 F.2d 1005 (3d Cir. 1966) Argued September 14, 1965
Decided January 27, 1966

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Joseph S. Lord, III, Judge.

Sidney J. Smolinsky, Philadelphia, Pa. (Bernard Sacks, Dorfman, Pechner, Sacks & Dorfman, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

William R. Deasey, Philadelphia, Pa. (Kelly, Deasey & Scanlan, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Corry, Kelly, Muldoon, Sobelman and Philadelphia Marine Trade Ass'n.

Marvin I. Barish, Philadelphia, Pa. (Abraham E. Freedman, Freedman, Borowsky & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for ILA, Trustees of Pension Fund et al.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge and KALODNER and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


Much of the previous history of this case is set out in 217 F. Supp. 401 (E.D. Pa. 1962), id., 404 (E.D. Pa. 1963) and 223 F. Supp. 489 (E.D. Pa. 1963), and need not be repeated here. The agreement was reformed in accordance with the opinion last cited and as required by it. See id. supra, 496. An examination of the record and of the briefs and consideration of the oral arguments lead us to the conclusion that the court below committed no error. Consequently, the order of the court below requiring judgment to be entered for the defendants and dissolving the injunction restraining the transfer of money from the royalty fund will be affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.