Sue F. George, Appellant, v. New York Life Insurance Company, a Mutual Insurance Company, Appellee, 353 F.2d 738 (9th Cir. 1965)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Northern Division; Ray McNichols, Judge.
William B. Bantz, of Bantz & Hemovich, Spokane, Wash., for appellant.
Benjamin H. Kizer, Robert E. Stoeve, of Turner, Stoeve & Layman, Spokane, Wash., for respondent.
Before POPE, JERTBERG and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In this action at law, tried to the court sitting without a jury, the district court made findings in favor of the defendant and entered judgment accordingly. Upon this appeal the contention is that the findings are clearly erroneous and that there was sufficient evidence to establish the claim of the plaintiff.
We have examined the record with care and the contentions of the appellant with respect thereto and we are forced to the conclusion that the findings are supported by the evidence, that they are not clearly erroneous, and that the judgment of the court below should be affirmed.
It is so ordered.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
