Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Petitioner, v. Mcnutt-boyce Company, Respondent, 324 F.2d 957 (5th Cir. 1963)
Annotate this CasePetition for Review of Decision of the Tax Court.
Crane C. Hauser, Chief Counsel, I. R. S., Glen E. Hardy, Atty., I. R. S., Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, David O. Walter, William A. Friedlander, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Junius H. Payne, Jr., Alexandria, La., Gerald D. Morgan, Arthur Peter, Jr., Lee I. Park, Washington, D. C., Hamel, Morgan, Park & Saunders, Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before RIVES, JONES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This controversy between a taxpayer and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue was ably discussed and properly decided by the Tax Court. McNutt-Boyce Company v. Commissioner, 38 T.C. 462. Its decision is
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
