Princeville Canning Company, Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent, 316 F.2d 735 (5th Cir. 1963)
Annotate this CasePetition to Review Order of the National Labor Relations Board.
Fred C. Jackson, Stephen P. Dart, Kilbourne, Dart & Jackson, St. Francisville, La., for respondent, Princeville Canning Co.
Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Jules H. Gordon, Atty., N. L. R. B., for respondent.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, JONES, Circuit Judge, and DE VANE, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Princeville Canning Company, by its petition for review, seeks to have set aside an order against it of the National Labor Relations Board. 133 N.L.R.B. 1232. The Board, by its answer, has requested enforcement of the order. A determination of the question as to whether the Board's findings are supported by substantial evidence will control our decision. No need is apparent for a discussion of the evidence which was submitted in the proceedings before the Board. The evidence supports the Board's findings and its order will be
Enforced.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
