National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Southwire Company, Respondent, 313 F.2d 638 (5th Cir. 1963)
Annotate this CasePetition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.
Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Alfred Brummel, Atty., Washington, D. C., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., National Labor Relations Bd., for petitioner.
Frank M. Swift, Atlanta, Ga., Smith, Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hancock, Atlanta, Ga., Holderness & Word, Carrollton, Ga., for respondent.
Before JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges, and GROOMS, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
In this proceeding for the enforcement against the respondent of an order of the petitioner, National Labor Relations Board, the only question before us is whether there is substantial evidence on the record as a whole to sustain the Board's findings. No purpose would be served by a recital of the evidence or of the fact issues which were resolved by the Board. There is substantial evidence to support the findings. The Board's order will be
Enforced.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
