Constance Visceglia, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.joseph Visceglia, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, 311 F.2d 946 (3d Cir. 1963)
Annotate this CaseDecided January 28, 1963
Petition for Review of the Decision of the Tax Court of the United States.
Jacob Leo Frank, New York City, for petitioners.
Norman Sepenuk, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Meyer Rothwacks, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.
Before STALEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges, and SHAW, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
This is a petition for review of a decision of the Tax Court. We have carefully reviewed the record and can find no abuse of discretion on the part of the Tax Court in either its entry of a default judgment in favor of the Commissioner or in its denial of a motion to file, out of time, a motion to vacate the default judgment.
The judgment of the Tax Court will be affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
