Myrtle H. Barron, Appellee, v. Abraham A. Ribicoff, As Secretary of Health, Deucation Andwelfare of the United States of America, Appellant, 295 F.2d 432 (4th Cir. 1961)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 295 F.2d 432 (4th Cir. 1961) Argued Oct. 6, 1961. Decided Oct. 17, 1961

David L. Rose, Attorney, Department of Justice, washington, D.C. (William H. Orrick, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., N. Welch Morrisette, Jr., U.S. Atty., Columbia, S.C., Morton Hollander and Ronald A. Jacks, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., on brief), for appellant.

Rebert J. Thomas, Columbia, S.C., on brief for appellee.

Before SOPER and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and MICHIE, Distruct Judge.

PER CURIAM.


This appeal is taken from a judgment of the District Court in an action brought under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.A. 405(g), to review a final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare denying the claim of the appellee for the benefits of the statute on the ground that she was employed by her sister at the rate of Seven Dollars a week. The claim was rejected by the Referee appointed to here the claim on the ground that the payments were made in an arrangement for the sharing of household expenses by the sisters and did not constitute wages paid by one to the other. The Appeals Council of the Social Security Administration declined to review the decision of the Referee and it thereupon became final. See 200 C.F.R. 403.710(e) and 404.951. The District Judge was of the opinion that the findings of the Referee were erroneous and, accordingly, entered judgment for the appellee. There was, however, substantial evidence in support of the Referee's findings and since Section 405(g) provides that the findings of the Secretary as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive the judgment of the District Court must be reversed.

Reversed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.