Roofire Alarm Company, Appellant, v. Underwriters' Laboratories, Inc., Appellee, 284 F.2d 360 (6th Cir. 1960)
Annotate this CaseSamuel M. Chambliss, Chambliss, Chambliss & Hodge, Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellant.
Jere T. Tipton, Miller, Martin, Hitching & Tipton, Chattanooga, Tenn., and Edward H. Hickey, Bell, Boyd, Marshall & Lloyd, Chicago, Ill., on brief, for appellee.
Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order of the trial court, sustaining the motion of defendant for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint.
For the reasons stated in the opinion of District Judge Darr, adequately expressed, the order of the United States District Court is affirmed. 188 F. Supp. 753.
It is so ordered.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
