Robert William Crawford, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Lt. D. Lydick, Toledo Police Dept. of Ohio, Lt. Woodrow W.zeitler, Toledo Police Dept. of Ohio, Landon, E. Hall, Clerkof the Municipal Court of Toledo, Ohio, Charles Conner Ofthe Kalamazoo Sheriff Dept., Kalamazoo, Michigan, Richardfuhrman, Kalamazoo, Michigan Police Dept., Jamesmorrison,kalamazoo, Michigan Police Dept., Riley Stewart,kalamazoo, Michigan Police Dept., Clark M. Olmsted,municipal Court Judge, Kalamazoo, Michigan, Lucien F. Sweet,circuit Court Judge, Kalamazoo, Michigan, Defendants and Appellees, 280 F.2d 426 (6th Cir. 1960)
Annotate this CaseRobert William Crawford, in pro. per.
John J. Burkhart, Toledo, Ohio, Richard H. Paulson and David Morris, Kalamazoo, Mich., for appellees.
Richard H. Paulson, Kalamazoo, Mich., on the brief for Lucien F. Sweet.
John J. Burkhart, Toledo, Ohio, on the Brief for Denzil Lydick, Woodrow W. Zeitler and Landon, E. Hall.
David Morris of Morris & Culver, and John M. Pikkaart, Kalamazoo, Mich., on the brief for Charles Conner, Richard Fuhrman, James Morrison, Riley Stewart, and Hon. clark M. Olmsted.
Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and MILLER and CECIL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of record, the briefs of the parties and the argument of appellees, and the Court being duly advised:
Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed on the opinion of Judge Raymond W. Starr. Crawford v. Lydick et al., 179 F. Supp. 211.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
