Lawrence E. Connelly et al., Plaintiffs-appellants, v. George W. Balkwill et al., Defendants-appellees, 279 F.2d 685 (6th Cir. 1960)
Annotate this CaseHarold K. Bell, and Robert E. Williamson, Lakewood, Ohio, for appellants.
Everett D. McCurdy and Lincoln Reavis of Spieth, Bell & McCurdy, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief.
Charles D. Johnson, of Baker, Hoststler & Patterson, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellees.
William B. Brooks, in pro. per., Chicago, Ill., E. S. Cummings, Jr. of Cummings & Wyman, Chicago, Ill., on the brief.
Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and CECIL and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit judges.
PER CURIAM.
The above cause coming on to the heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and the same is affirmed upon the opinion of Judge McNamee granting Apellees' motion for summary judgment, reported in Connelly v. Balkwill, 174 F. Supp. 49.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
