Camiel Thorrez, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, 272 F.2d 945 (6th Cir. 1959)
Annotate this CasePhillip C. Kelly, Jackson, Mich., for petitioner.
Charles K. Rice, Arch M. Cantrall, Lee A. Jackson, Joseph Kovner, A. M. Sellers, Robt. N. Anderson, Fred E. Youngman, Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before MARTIN and WEICK, Circuit Judges, and BROOKS, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
This case involving Sections 1003(b) (3), 1000(f) (1) (A) and 1004(a) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 1003(b) (3), 1000(f) (1) (A), 1004(a) (1), was heard upon petition for review of the decision of the Tax Court of the United States. The principal question presented on appeal was whether gifts in trust made by the taxpayer for the benefit of minor grandchildren were gifts of present or of future interests.
We agree with the decision of the Tax Court that the gifts were of future interests for the reasons stated in its opinion, 31 T.C. 655.
The decision of the Tax Court is affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
