Joyce De La Begassiere, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, 272 F.2d 709 (5th Cir. 1959)
Annotate this CasePetition for Review of Decision of the Tax Court of the United States (District of Texas).
Bernard Weiss, New York City, for petitioner.
Arthur I. Gould, Harry Baum, Meyer Rothwacks, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Howard A. Heffron, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Charles P. Dugan, Sp. Atty., I.R.S., Arch M. Cantrall, Chief Counsel, I.R.S., Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before CAMERON, JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
In this case, where the issue is primarily one of fact, it does not appear that the findings of the Tax Court are clearly erroneous, nor does it appear that the Tax Court failed to apply the correct rules of law. De la Begassiere v. Commissioner, 31 T.C. 1031. The decision of the Tax Court is
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
