Rayburn E. Hahn, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, 271 F.2d 739 (5th Cir. 1959)
Annotate this CasePetition for Review of Decision of the Tax Court of the United States (District of Texas).
Rayburn E. Hahn, in pro. per.
Arthur I. Gould, Lee A. Jackson, Meyer Rothwacks, Carter Bledsoe, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Arch M. Cantrall, Chief Counsel, I.R.S., Rollin H. Transue, Sp. Atty., I.R.S., Washington, D. C., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Before CAMERON, JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The issue presented here and the facts from which the issue arose are fully set forth in the opinion of the Tax Court. Hahn v. Commissioner, 30 T.C. 195. Since we conclude that the question raised was properly determined, the decision of the Tax Court is
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
