Lloyd R. Edick, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 264 F.2d 229 (6th Cir. 1959)
Annotate this CaseRoy Cook, Kansas City, Kan., for appellant.
Fred W. Kaess, Donald F. Welday, Jr., U. S. Attys., Detroit, Mich., for appellee.
Before MARTIN, Chief Judge, and MATHES and SHELBOURNE, District Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on the briefs and the record in the cause. Whereupon, the United States Attorney admitted that appellant had been denied effective assistance of counsel, within the requirement of the Sixth Amendment, upon arraignment and upon the entry of a guilty plea, and it appearing that the action of the United States Attorney in this respect was in consonance with appropriate authority.
The judgment of the United States District Court, in denying the motion of appellant to vacate sentence pronounced upon him, is directed to be set aside and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
