Jack Stinnett v. A. Marlo Miller, 259 F.2d 272 (10th Cir. 1958)

Annotate this Case

US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit - 259 F.2d 272 (10th Cir. 1958) July 9, 1958

Cooney & Morgan, Farmington, N.M., for appellant.

Hannett, Hannett & Cornish, Albuquerque, N.M., for appellee.

Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, and HUXMAN and MURRAH, Circuit Judges.

PER DURIAM.

Reversed as to costs without written opinion.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.