Max Tendler, Appellant, v. Nick Basiliko et al., Appellees, 231 F.2d 516 (D.C. Cir. 1956)
Annotate this CaseDecided March 29, 1956
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; Alexander Holtzoff, Judge.
Mr. Max Tendler, Washington, D. C., appellant pro se.
Mr. J. Zitomer, Washington, D. C., filed a brief for appellant.
Mr. Harry L. Ryan, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Roger J. Whiteford, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellees Basiliko.
Before WILBUR K. MILLER, WASHINGTON and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This appeal, in essence, represents an effort by appellant to obtain relief from the terms of agreements and stipulations which he made as a result of his involvement in an unfortunate real estate transaction. The questions presented were carefully considered at hearings held before three Judges of the District Court on successive motions of the parties. All concluded that appellant was not entitled to relief. We agree. The judgment appealed from will be
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
