Arthur W. Einstein and Jean M. Einstein, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.robert M. Brown and Margaret L. Brown, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.g. Glen Anderson and Naomi D. Anderson, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, 230 F.2d 951 (6th Cir. 1956)
Annotate this CasePetition to review decision of Tax Court.
Mooney, Hahn, Loeser, Keough & Freedheim, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioners.
H. Brian Holland, Ellis N. Slack, Frank E. A. Sander, and Karl Schmeidler, Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The above causes coming on to be heard upon the transcript of record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised.
Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the decisions be and are hereby affirmed upon the findings of fact and opinion of the Tax Court.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
