Biever Motor Car Company, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Chrysler Corporation, Defendant-appellee, 199 F.2d 758 (2d Cir. 1952)
Annotate this CaseDecided December 1, 1952
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut; Carroll C. Hincks, Judge.
From a summary judgment for the defendant in an action by The Biever Motor Car Company against the Chrysler Corporation for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals.
Herbert L. Emanuelson, New Haven, Conn. (James G. Austin, Hornell, N. Y., Richard J. Bookhout and Sterling P. Harrington, Oneonton, N. Y., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.
Cummings & Lockwood, Stamford, Conn., Raymond E. Hackett, Stamford, Conn., William H. Timbers, New York City, and George F. Lowman, Stamford, Conn. (Francis S. Bensel, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.
Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed on the authority of Bushwick-Decatur Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 2 Cir., 116 F.2d 675.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
