Hammond v. Hammond, 198 F.2d 529 (D.C. Cir. 1952)Annotate this Case
Decided June 26, 1952
James T, Wright, Washington, D. C., for appellant.
William L. Houston, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before EDGERTON, CLARK, and WILBUR, K. MILLER, Circuit Judges.
In the absence of sexual intercourse between appellant and appellee, her continuing for a few weeks to live in the same house with him after she knew of his adultery was not condonation and did not bar her divorce suit. Boyce v. Boyce, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 355, 153 F.2d 229. We have examined appellant's other contentions but find no error.