National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. American Thread Company, Respondent, 188 F.2d 161 (5th Cir. 1951)
Annotate this CaseOn Motion of the National Labor Relations Board.
A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent.
Before HUTCHESON, Chief judge, and HOLMES and BORAH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The motion is granted, with recognition of the fact that respondent does not resist, but claims to be in compliance with, the Board's order. The decree to be entered here, therefore, will provide that whatever the respondent has already done toward compliance with the order of the Board prior to entry of this Court's decree will not be required to be redone, and only such things, if any, as have been left undone will be required to be done.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
