Hudson Engineering Corporation, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.commissioner of Internal Revenue, Petitioner, v. Edward J. Hudson et al., Respondents, 184 F.2d 518 (5th Cir. 1950)
Annotate this CaseWalter E. Barton, Washington, D.C., for taxpayers.
Harry Marselli, Ellis N. Slack, Hilbert P. Zarky, Special Assistants to Attorney General, Theron L. Caudle, Assistant Attorney General, Charles Oliphant, Chief Counsel, Bernard D. Daniels, Special Attorney, Bureau of Internal Revenue, Washington, D.C., for Commissioner.
Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and McCORD and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to the motion and order entered on September 19, 1949 to enter judgment in the case of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. John B. Baird, Tax Court Docket No. 16382, consonant with the judgment entered in the case of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Edward J. Hudson, Tax Court Docket No. 16380, and the motion for judgment filed by the respondent to enter judgment in the case of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. John B. Baird, Tax Court Docket No. 16382 consonant with the judgment entered by this Court in the case entitled Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Petitioner, v. Edward J. Hudson, Respondent, 5 Cir., 183 F.2d 180.
It is now here ordered, adjudged and decreed by this Court that the judgment of the Tax Court of the United States in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. John B. Baird, 11 T.C. 1042, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
