Herbert Windsor and Baeda E. Windsor, Appellants, v. United States of America, Appellee, 184 F.2d 184 (9th Cir. 1950)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 184 F.2d 184 (9th Cir. 1950) September 1, 1950

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Southern Division, Herbert W. Erskine, Judge.

Perry P. Yohe, North Hollywood, Cal., for appellant.

Frank J. Hennessy, U. S. Atty., Rudolph J. Scholz, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before MATHEWS and ORR, Circuit Judges, and LEMMON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.


The question presented by this appeal is whether the District Court's findings of fact are clearly erroneous. See Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. They are not. The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.