United States v. All American Airways, Inc, 180 F.2d 592 (9th Cir. 1950)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 180 F.2d 592 (9th Cir. 1950) February 17, 1950
Rehearing Denied April 4, 1950

Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Harry Marselli, and Irving I. Axelrad, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Ernest A. Tolin, U. S. Atty., E. H. Mitchell, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal. for the United States.

Guthrie, Darling & Shattuck, Los Angeles, Cal. (Hale, Stimson & Russell, New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and ORR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


This appeal is from a consent judgment — a judgment which was consented to by appellant and appellee, and which the District Court had jurisdiction to render. Such a judgment is not reversible. Pacific R. R. v. Ketchum, 101 U.S. 289, 295, 25 L. Ed. 932; United States v. Babbitt, 104 U.S. 767, 768, 26 L. Ed. 921; Ballot v. United States, 1 Cir., 171 F. 404, 405; Curry v. Curry, 65 App.D.C. 47, 79 F.2d 172, 174; In re 4145 Broadway Hotel Co., 7 Cir., 100 F.2d 7, 8. See, also, Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. United States, 113 U.S. 261, 266, 5 S. Ct. 460, 28 L. Ed. 971; Swift & Co. v. United States, 276 U.S. 311, 327, 48 S. Ct. 311, 72 L. Ed. 587. The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.