Ring Engineering Co. v. Otis Elevator Co, 179 F.2d 812 (D.C. Cir. 1950)
Annotate this CaseDecided January 23, 1950
Mr. James M. Earnest, Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Mr. Philip W. Amram, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Jerome J. Dick, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.
Before EDGERTON, CLARK, and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This case involves interpretation of a contract for installing elevators in an office building in Washington, D. C. We agree with the District Court's interpretation. Furthermore, appellant may not overturn a summary judgment by raising here an issue of fact that was not plainly disclosed as a genuine issue in the trial court. Fletcher v. Krise, 73 App.D.C. 266, 120 F.2d 809; Williams v. Kolb, 79 U.S. App.D.C. 253, 145 F.2d 344. Garrett Biblical Institute v. American University, 82 U.S.App.D.C., 265, 163 F.2d 265, is not to the contrary.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
