In re: Angelique Layton

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 14-BG-327 IN RE: ANGELIQUE LAYTON, Respondent. Bar Registration No. 427713 BEFORE: BDN: 14-14 McLeese, Associate Judge, and Steadman and Reid, Senior Judges. ORDER (FILED - June 12, 2014) On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Colorado for a period of six months, all stayed upon the successful completion of a three-year probationary period subject to conditions, this court s April 3, 2014, order directing respondent to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, the response of respondent, and the statement of Bar Counsel, and it appearing that respondent s response does not satisfy any of the grounds for not imposing reciprocal discipline, see D.C. Bar R. XI ยง 11 (c), it is ORDERED that Angelique Layton is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months, all stayed upon the successful completion of a threeyear probationary period subject to the conditions imposed by the state of Colorado. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). PER CURIAM

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.