Woods v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

4IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DANIEL M. WOODS, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 64, 2020 Court Below—Superior Court of the State of Delaware Cr. ID Nos. 1701019682, 1702009077, 1702009428 (N) Submitted: April 17, 2020 Decided: June 17, 2020 Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices. ORDER After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs1 and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its January 29, 2020 Order denying the appellant’s first motion for postconviction relief under Superior Court Criminal Rule 61.2 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice The appellant’s motion to strike the appellee’s answering brief based on minor mistakes in the Table of Citations is denied. 2 State v. Woods, 2020 WL 491187 (Del. Super. Ct. Jan. 29, 2020). 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.