Maddox v. CitiMortgage, Inc.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LEO R. MADDOX, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., Defendant Below, Appellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 150, 2014 Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware in and for Kent County C.A. No. K13C-02-027 Submitted: April 21, 2014 Decided: June 5, 2014 Before BERGER, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices. ORDER This 5th day of June 2014, having considered the opening brief filed by the appellant, Leo R. Maddox ( Maddox ), and the motion to affirm filed by the appellee, CitiMortgage, Inc. ( Citi ), we have determined, upon de novo review of the record, that the Superior Court did not err by dismissing Maddox s civil action against Citi. We further conclude that the dismissal of Maddox s complaint and the denial of his motion for reargument should be affirmed on the basis of, and for the reasons stated in, the Superior Court orders dated December 13, 2013 and February 28, 2014.* * Maddox v. CitiMortgage, Inc., 2014 WL 1155312 (Del. Super. Feb. 28, 2014); Maddox v. CitiMortgage, Inc., C.A. No. K13-02-027 (Del. Super. Dec. 13, 2013) (Letter and Order). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is GRANTED. The judgments of the Superior Court are AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jack B. Jacobs Justice 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.