Miller v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THOMAS R. MILLER, § § § § § § § § § § § Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. No. 665, 2012 Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for Sussex County C.A. No. S12M-12-010 Submitted: February 7, 2013 Decided: March 20, 2013 ORDER Before BERGER, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices. This 20th day of March 2013, having considered the appellant s opening brief and the appellee s motion to affirm under Supreme Court Rule 25(a),1 it appears to the Court that: (1) The appellant, Thomas R. Miller, appeals from a Superior Court order dated December 11, 2012, denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The appellee, State of Delaware, moves to affirm the Superior 1 The Court has not considered the appellant s motion to address, which seeks permission to respond to the appellee s motion to affirm. See DEL. SUPR. CT. R. 25(a)(iii) (providing that there shall be no response to a motion to affirm unless requested by the Court). Court s judgment on the ground that it is manifest on the face of the opening brief that the appeal is without merit. We agree and affirm. (2) Miller is currently serving a life sentence that was imposed in May 1994 after a Superior Court jury convicted him of Unlawful Sexual Intercourse in the First Degree. This Court affirmed on direct appeal.2 On December 7, 2012, Miller filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. By order dated December 11, 2012, the Superior Court denied his petition. This appeal followed. (3) When a prisoner s commitment is plainly and fully set forth, there can be no habeas corpus relief.3 In this case, because Miller s commitment is valid on its face, the Superior Court correctly determined that his petition did not support the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the State s motion to affirm is GRANTED. The judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jack B. Jacobs Justice 2 Miller v. State, 660 A.2d 394, 1995 WL 301379 (Del. May 9, 1995) (TABLE) (affirming convictions and sentences). 3 Hall v. Carr, 692 A.2d 888, 891 (Del. 1997) (quoting DEL. CODE ANN. § 6902(1)). 2 TIT. 10,
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
