Bradley v. State

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RAYMOND E. BRADLEY, Defendant BelowAppellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff BelowAppellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 389, 2011 Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for Sussex County Cr. ID 92S05720DI Submitted: October 24, 2011 Decided: October 27, 2011 Before HOLLAND, BERGER, and JACOBS, Justices ORDER This 27th day of October 2011, after careful consideration of the parties briefs and the record on appeal, we find it manifest that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court=s well-reasoned decision dated July 6, 2010. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that appellant s third motion for postconviction relief was both untimely and repetitive. Appellant had failed to overcome these procedural hurdles because, contrary to appellant s argument, this Court s decision in Blake v. State1 did not create a newly recognized right. 1 Blake v. State, 3 A.3d 1077 (Del. 2011). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Carolyn Berger Justice 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.