Scalia v. Romirowsky, PhD.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOSEPH SCALIA, Plaintiff, v. SAMUEL ROMIROWSKY, PhD., Defendant. § § § § § § § § § No. 15, 2010 Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County C.A. No. 09C-03-230 Submitted: September 1, 2010 Decided: September 2, 2010 Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and JACOBS, Justices. ORDER This 2nd of September 2010, the Court having considered this matter after oral argument, has determined that it is manifest on the face that the appeal is without merit because: to the extent the issues raised on appeal are factual, the record evidence supports the trial judge s factual findings; to the extent the errors alleged on appeal are attributed to an abuse of discretion, the record does not support those assertions; and to the extent that the issues raised on appeal are legal, they are controlled by settled Delaware law, which was properly applied. Therefore, this Court has concluded that the final judgment of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its bench rulings dated July 29, 2009 and December 9, 2009. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Randy J. Holland Justice
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
