Segal v. Fisk Ventures, LLC, et al.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ANDREW SEGAL, § § Respondent Below, § Appellant, § § v. § § FISK VENTURES, LLC, § § Petitioner Below, § Appellee, § and § GENITRIX, LLC, § § Nominal Respondent Below, § Appellee, § and § H. FISK JOHNSON, STEPHEN § ROSE and WILLIAM FREUND, § § Third-party Respondents Below,§ Appellees. § No. 39, 2010 Court Below Court of Chancery, in and for New Castle County C.A. No. 3017 Submitted: July 7, 2010 Decided: July 27, 2010 Before HOLLAND, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices. ORDER This 27th day of July 2010, it appears to the Court that: 1) The Respondent, Third Party and Counterclaim Petitioner- appellant, Andrew Segal ( Segal ), appeals from the December 23, 2009 final judgment of the Court of Chancery that denied Segal s motion to enjoin or stay the sale of intellectual property assets by Nominal Respondentappellee, Genitrix, LLC, and denied Segal s motion for a temporary restraining order or, in the alternative, for the imposition of a constructive trust over the intellectual property assets and the consideration paid for such assets. 2) Having considered this matter after oral argument and on the briefs filed by the parties, we have determined that the final judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Court of Chancery in its letter opinion dated December 23, 2009. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Randy J. Holland Justice 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
