Arnold v. DFS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KATIE ARNOLD,1 § § § § § § § § § § § § Respondent BelowAppellant, v. DFS, Petitioner BelowAppellee. No. 243, 2010 Court Below Family Court of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County File Nos. CN08-05964; 05965 CN09-05235 CN09-05241 E09-10-06TN Petition Nos. 08-38595; 08-38601 09-33834; 09-32035 09-32024; 09-40323 09-41085 Submitted: July 14, 2010 Decided: July 23, 2010 ORDER This 23rd day of July 2010, it appears to the Court that, on June 22, 2010, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant s failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by failing to pay the Family Court filing fee and transcript costs. The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required 10-day period.2 Therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. 1 The Court sua sponte assigned a pseudonym to the appellant by Order dated April 29, 2010. 2 All attempts by the Office of the Clerk to locate the appellant have failed. The appellant has not notified the Clerk s Office of her new address and all notices and letters have been returned to the sender unclaimed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Carolyn Berger Justice 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
