Baird v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STEVEN J. BAIRD, JR., Petitioner Below, Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Respondent Below, Appellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 218, 2009 Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware in and for Sussex County C. A. No. S09X-02-002 Submitted: June 23, 2009 Decided: June 29, 2009 ORDER This 29th day of June 2009, the Court has considered the Clerk s notice directing that appellant, Steven J. Baird, Jr., show cause pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) why this appeal should not be dismissed for Baird s failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by not arranging for payment to the court reporter of the transcript ordered for the appeal. Baird has not responded to the notice to show cause. Baird s failure to respond to the notice to show cause is deemed to be his consent to the dismissal of the appeal. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Henry duPont Ridgely Justice
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
