Ostroff v. Quality Services

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MARGARET E. OSTROFF, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Below, Appellant, v. QUALITY SERVICES LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Below, Appellee. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § No. 82, 2007 Court Below Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County C.A. No. 423-NC ORDER This 30th day of April 2007, it appears to the Court that, on April 9, 2007, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant's failure to diligently prosecute her appeal by not filing her opening brief and appendix in this matter. The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jack B. Jacobs Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.