Wright v. DCSE/Nailah Grinnage

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ERRICK M. WRIGHT, Petitioner Below, Appellant, v. DCSE/NAILAH GRINNAGE, Respondent Below, Appellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 593, 2006 Court Below: Family Court of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County File No. CN91-07617 CPI No. 06-22642 DCSE No. 233688 ORDER This 20th day of February 2007, it appears to the Court that: (1) On January 23, 2007, the Clerk issued a notice directing Errick M. Wright to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b), for his failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by failing to pay the Family Court filing fee and transcript cost. (2) Mr. Wright has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Randy J. Holland Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.