Proctor v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RONALD E. PROCTOR, JR., Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Defendant Below, Appellee. Submitted: Decided: § § § § § § § § § § § No. 483, 2005 Court Below--Superior Court of the State of Delaware in and for Kent County C.A. No. 00A-12-003 November 13, 2006 December 27, 2006 Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and JACOBS, Justices. ORDER This 27th day of December, it appears that the Clerk issued a notice directing that the appellant, Ronald E. Proctor, Jr., show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to file the opening brief and appendix.* Proctor s response to the notice does not establish good cause why this appeal should not be dismissed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jack B. Jacobs Justice * See Proctor v. State, Del. Supr., No. 483, 2005, Berger, J. (Nov. 2, 2006) (order denying motion for stay) (directing that Clerk issue notice to show cause for Proctor s failure to file opening brief and appendix where Proctor was otherwise able to file numerous letters and motions in support of appeal and had received three extensions of time).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
