Hionis v. Shipp
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE HARALAMBOS HIONIS, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. DONALD W. SHIPP, JR. and SUSAN S. SPENCER, Defendants Below, Appellees. § § § § § § § § § § § § No. 316, 2005 Court Below: Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, in and for Sussex County C.A. No. 270 Submitted: March 1, 2006 Decided: June 28, 2006 Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and JACOBS, Justices. ORDER This 28th day of June 2006, upon consideration of the briefs of the parties, the record in this case, and their contentions in oral argument, it appears to the Court that the judgment of the Court of Chancery granting summary judgment in favor of defendants, Donald W. Shipp, Jr. and Susan S. Spencer, and against the plaintiff, Haralambos Hionis, should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons set forth by the Court of Chancery in its well-reasoned decision dated June 16, 2005.* * We reject the appellant s claim that the evidence was insufficient to support an award of summary judgment. The affidavit relied upon by the Court of Chancery contained uncontroverted material facts that support the Court of Chancery s ruling. Because there were no disputes of material fact, summary judgment was appropriate. DEL. CH. CT. R. 56(c). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery is AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jack B. Jacobs Justice
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
