Holland v. Rust-Holland

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BRYON C. HOLLAND, Respondent Below, Appellant, v. PAMELA RUST-HOLLAND, Petitioner Below, Appellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 250, 2005 Court Below Family Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County File No. CN99-09654 Petition No. 05-15776 ORDER This 15th day of July 2005, it appears to the Court that: (1) On June 15, 2005, the Clerk of this Court issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant s failure to comply with Rule 42 when taking an appeal from an apparent interlocutory order. (2) The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required 10-day period. Therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Randy J. Holland Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.