In Re: Oracle Corp. Derivative Litigation

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE: ORACLE CORP. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION, § § § Thomas J. Barone, Richard K. Riman, § Daniel Ordona, and Nicholas Vitani, § § Plaintiffs Below, § Appellants, § § v. § § Oracle Corporation, Lawrence J. § Ellison, and Jeffrey O. Henley, § § Defendants Below, § Appellees. § No. 561, 2004 Court Below Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County C.A. No. 18751 Consolidated Submitted: April 13, 2005 Decided: April 14, 2005 Before HOLLAND, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices. ORDER This 14th day of April 2005, the Court having considered this matter after oral argument and on the briefs filed by the parties has determined that the final judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Court of Chancery in its decision dated November 24, 2004 and revised on December 2, 2004. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Randy J. Holland Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.