Brahmbatt v. Brahmbatt

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NAYNA BRAHMBHATT, Respondent BelowAppellant, v. GAUTAMKUMAR BRAHMBHATT, Petitioner BelowAppellee. § § § § § § § § § § § § No. 364, 2003 Court Below---Family Court of the State of Delaware, in and for Sussex County File No. CS02-03438 Petition No. 02-14076 Submitted: January 30, 2004 Decided: February 24, 2004 Before BERGER, STEELE and JACOBS, Justices ORDER This 24th day of February 2004, upon consideration of the briefs of the parties and the record below, it appears to the Court that the judgment of the Family Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons set forth in its decision dated June 25, 2003. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family Court is AFFIRMED.1 BY THE COURT: /s/ Myron T. Steele Justice 1 In his answering brief, Appellee requests this Court to order Appellant s brother to stop harassing him and to order Appellant to cease using his name. These requests are not properly before this Court and, therefore, will not be considered in this appeal.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.