Moore v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THOMAS L. MOORE, Defendant BelowAppellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff BelowAppellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 519, 2001 Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County Cr. ID 9902006667 Submitted: June 19, 2002 Decided: July 16, 2002 Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, WALSH, and STEELE, Justices. ORDER This 16th day of July 2002, we have carefully considered appellant Thomas Moore s opening brief and the State s motion to affirm. We find it manifest on the face of the opening brief that the appeal is without merit because the issue on appeal is clearly controlled by a prior decision of the Court in this case.* In appeal No. 285, 2001, we held, among other things, that the Superior Court s sentence for Moore s second violation of probation properly credited Moore with all time previously served at Level V. Moore is not entitled to any additional credit. That ruling is the law of the case. Accordingly, the Superior Court s decision denying Moore s latest motion for reduction of sentence is controlled by settled law. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the State's motion to affirm is GRANTED. The judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: _/s/ Myron T. Steele__________________ Justice * Moore v. State, Del. Supr., No. 285, 2001, Walsh, J. (Jan. 9, 2002). -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
