Moore v. State

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THOMAS L. MOORE, Defendant BelowAppellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff BelowAppellee. § § § § § § § § § § § Nos. 358, 2002; 415, 2002; and 416, 2002 Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County C.A. Nos. 02M-05-048 02M-06-032 and 02M-06-076 Submitted: October 16, 2002 Decided: November 25, 2002 Before HOLLAND, BERGER, and STEELE, Justices. ORDER This 25th day of November 2002, upon consideration of the appellant s opening brief and the State s motion to affirm, it appears to the Court that: (1) The appellant, Thomas Moore, filed these consolidated appeals from the Superior Court s denial of Moore s three separate petitions seeking habeas corpus relief. The crux of Moore s contentions below was that the Superior Court had erred in sentencing him for violating probation because the sentence imposed failed to credit Moore with good time he had previously earned. The Superior Court denied all three habeas corpus petitions on the ground that Moore was legally detained. The State has moved to affirm the Superior Court s judgments on the ground that it is manifest on the face of Moore s opening brief that his consolidated appeals are without merit. We agree and affirm. (2) Unlike its federal counterpart, the writ of habeas corpus under Delaware law provides relief on a very limited basis.1 Habeas corpus provides an opportunity for one illegally confined or incarcerated to obtain judicial review of the jurisdiction of the court ordering the commitment.2 In Moore s case, the Superior Court had jurisdiction to incarcerate Moore for violating probation. As we have previously have held, Moore s term of imprisonment was valid on its face.3 Therefore, Moore was not entitled to seek habeas corpus relief.4 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgments of the Superior Court are AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Carolyn Berger Justice 1 Hall v. Carr, 692 A.2d 888, 891 (Del. 1997). 2 In re Pitt, 541 A.2d 554, 557 (Del. 1988). 3 Moore v. State, Del. Supr., No. 285, 2001, Walsh, J. (Jan. 9, 2002) (affirming Superior Court s VOP sentence). 4 Curran v. Woolley, 104 A.2d 771, 773 (Del. 1954). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.