Jones v. Trotter

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SANDRA JONES, Defendant BelowAppellant, v. EUGENE TROTTER AND MYRTLE TROTTER, Plaintiffs BelowAppellees. § § § § § § § § § § § § No. 442, 2001 Court Below-Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, in and for Sussex County C.A. No. 2065-S Submitted: October 5, 2001 Decided: November 8, 2001 Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, WALSH and HOLLAND, Justices. ORDER This 8th day of November 2001, the Court has considered the appellees motion to affirm pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 25(a) and finds it manifest on the face of the appellant s opening brief that the appeal is without merit for the reasons stated by the Court of Chancery in its well-reasoned decision dated August 17, 2001. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the appellees motion to affirm is GRANTED. The judgment of the Court of Chancery is AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/ E. Norman Veasey Chief Justice -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.