AmVets Post No. 2 v. The Delaware Board of Charitable Gaming

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE T. HENLEY GRAVES SUSSEX COUNTY COURTHOUSE RESIDENT JUDGE 1 THE CIRCLE, SUITE 2 GEORGETOWN, DE 19947 (302) 856-5257 October 16, 2017 Richard E. Berl, Jr., Esquire Berl & Feinberg, LLP Dartmouth Business Center - Suite 3 34382 Carpenter’s Way Lewes, Delaware 19958 Re: Carla A.K. Jarosz, Esquire Department of Justice 820 N. French Street, Sixth Floor Wilmington, Delaware 19801 AmVets Post No. 2 v. The Delaware Board of Charitable Gaming; C.A. No. S17A-02-003 Date Submitted: Date Decided: October 12, 2017 October 16, 2017 On Appellant’s Motion to Reargue: DENIED Dear Counsel: Appellant has filed a timely Motion to Reargue the Court’s decision entered on September 29, 2017. Appellee responded thereto. The purpose of reargument is very limited. “[M]otions for reargument should not be used merely to rehash the arguments already decided by the court, or to present new arguments not previously raised.”1 The Court has reviewed its decision and is satisfied that it addresses the issues raised in Appellant’s appeal from the Delaware Board of Charitable Gaming. 1 Blevins v. Metzgar, 2017 WL 2709748 (Del. Super. June 22, 2017) (citations omitted). Appellant’s Motion to Reargue is DENIED. Very truly yours, /s/ T. Henley Graves T. Henley Graves oc: Prothonotary 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.