State of Delaware v. Bailey.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY STATE OF DELAWARE, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. AIEYNA BAILEY, Defendant. Cr. ID. No. 1205023486 Submitted: February 22, 2015 Decided: March 25, 2015 Upon Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation that Defendant’s Motion for Postconviction Relief Should be Denied and Counsel’s Motion to Withdraw Should be Granted. ADOPTED ORDER This 25th day of March, 2015, the Court has considered the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation. On April 9, 2014, Defendant Aieyna Bailey filed a pro se motion for postconviction relief. Subsequently, Defendant was assigned counsel. Assigned counsel then filed an Amended Motion for Post-Conviction Relief as well as a Motion to Withdraw as Postconviction Counsel pursuant to Superior Court Criminal Rule 61(e)(2). The motions were referred to a Superior Court Commissioner in accordance with 10 Del. C. § 512(b) and Superior Court Criminal Rule 62 for proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The Commissioner issued the Report and Recommendation on February 12, 2015. The Commissioner recommended that Defendant’s Motion for Postconviction Relief be denied, and that Counsel’s Motion to Withdraw should be granted. “Within ten days after filing of a Commissioner’s proposed findings of fact and recommendations . . . any party may serve and file written objections.” 1 Neither party has filed an objection to the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation. The Court holds that the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation dated February 12, 2015, should be adopted for the reasons set forth therein. The Commissioner’s findings are not clearly erroneous, are not contrary to law, and are not an abuse of discretion.2 THEREFORE, the Court hereby accepts the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation in its entirety. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Mary M. Johnston_________ The Honorable Mary M. Johnston 1 Super. Ct. Crim. R. 62(a)(5)(ii). 2 Super. Ct. Crim. R. 62(a)(4)(iv).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
