RoundPoint Mortgage Servicing Corporation, et al. v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation, et al.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
SAM GLASSCOCK III VICE CHANCELLOR COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE COURT OF CHANCERY COURTHOUSE 34 THE CIRCLE GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947 May 7, 2020 Kevin R. Shannon, Esq. Christopher N. Kelly, Esq. Daniel M. Rusk, Esq. POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP 1313 N. Market Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Rudolf Koch, Esq. Kevin M. Gallagher, Esq. Kevin M. Regan, Esq. RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER P.A. One Rodney Square 920 North King Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801 RE: RoundPoint Mortgage Servicing Corporation, et al. v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation et al., C.A. No. 2020-0161-SG Dear Counsel: I have Plaintiffs’ motion for reargument. The Plaintiffs have moved for reargument of a scheduling order. A motion for reargument is appropriate in two circumstances: where the court has “overlooked a decision or principle of law that would have controlling effect or misapprehended the facts or the law so the outcome of the decision would be different.” RE: Kratos Def. & Sec. Sols., Inc., v. Securitas Elec. Sec., Inc., 2020 WL 1922000, at *1 (Del. Ch. Apr. 20, 2020) (quoting Pontone v. Milso Indus. Corp., 2014 WL 4352341, at *1 (Del. Ch. Sept. 13, 2014)). Neither of those circumstances is present here. Plaintiffs simply disagree with a matter within the court’s discretion. Coleman v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLC, 902 A.2d 1102, 1107 (Del. 2006) (“It is well settled that the trial court has discretion to resolve scheduling issues and to control its own docket.” (internal quotations omitted)). Therefore, to the extent I consider the Plaintiffs’ motion a motion for reargument it is denied. I find it appropriate, however, to consider the Plaintiffs’ motion a motion for reconsideration of scheduling, I have directed my Assistant to contact the parties to schedule a teleconference promptly regarding moving this matter forward. To the extent the foregoing requires an order to take effect, it is SO ORDERED. Sincerely, /s/ Sam Glasscock III Sam Glasscock III 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
