HM Life Insurance Company, et al. v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, et al.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

SAM GLASSCOCK III VICE CHANCELLOR COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE COURT OF CHANCERY COURTHOUSE 34 THE CIRCLE GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947 Date Submitted: April 3, 2020 Date Decided: April 9, 2020 Brian M. Gottesman, Esq. David B. Anthony, Esq. BERGER HARRIS LLP 1105 N. Market St., 11th Floor Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Adam V. Orlacchio, Esq. BLANK ROME LLP 1201 N. Market Street, Suite 800 Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Mackenzie M. Wrobel, Esq. DUANE MORRIS LLP 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1600 Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Elena C. Norman, Esq. Michael A. Laukaitis II, Esq. YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP Rodney Square 1000 North King Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Steven T. Margolin, Esq. Samuel L. Moultrie, Esq. GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP The Nemours Building 1007 North Orange Street, Suite 1200 Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Stamatios Stamoulis, Esq. STAMOULIS & WEINBLATT LLC 800 N. West Street, Third Floor Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Re: HM Life Insurance Company, et al. v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, et al., C.A. No. 2018-0649-SG Dear Counsel: The Plaintiffs, HM Life Insurance Company and HM Life Insurance Company of New York, have filed this Action in connection with a series of insurance transactions, alleging twenty-four counts against twenty-one Defendants.1 The Plaintiffs allege a “coordinated and elaborate scheme to defraud them through a complex series of reinsurance transactions, trust agreements, and investment vehicles.”2 The Plaintiffs further allege that a Delaware statutory trust, and its series, were “created and used for the sole purpose to conceal from Plaintiffs unauthorized investments in volatile hedge funds and the significant resulting losses.”3 Defendant Blue Elite Fund, Limited (“Blue Elite”) is an exempt company organized and existing under the laws of the Cayman Islands with its principal place of business in the Cayman Islands.4 The Plaintiffs have brought claims against Blue Elite for aiding and abetting fraud and tortious interference with contractual relations. Defendant Blue II, Limited (“Blue II”) is an exempt company organized and existing under the laws of the Cayman Islands with its principal place of business in 1 Defendant John Drake was dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Chancery Court Rule 41(a)(1)(ii). Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice as to John Drake, D.I. 110. 2 Verified Third Amended Compl. for Breach of Trust Agreements, Breach of Fiduciary Duties, Negligence, and Related Torts, D.I. 80, ¶ 1. 3 Id. 4 Id. ¶ 22. 2 the Cayman Islands.5 The Plaintiffs have brought claims against Blue II for aiding and abetting fraud and tortious interference with contractual relations. Defendant Donald Solow is an individual and resident of the State of New Jersey and was, at all times relevant to this matter, the owner, manager, and/or person in charge of Defendant Regatta Holdings LLC, and a director and/or owner of Defendants Alpha Re Limited and Alpha Re Holdings (Cayman) Limited.6 The Plaintiffs have brought claims against Solow for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, unjust enrichment, and tortious interference with contractual relations. Defendant Edward Brendan Lynch is an individual and a resident of Nassau, New Providence, Bahamas and is a director and/or owner of Defendants Alpha Re Limited, Alpha Re Holdings (Cayman) Limited, Blue Elite, Blue II, and Atlantic Specialty Finance Limited.7 The Plaintiffs have brought claims against Lynch for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, unjust enrichment, and tortious interference with contractual relations. Defendant Gregory Tolaram is an individual and a resident of Bermuda and is a director and/or owner of Defendants Alpha Re Limited, Alpha Re Holdings 5 Id. ¶ 23. Id. ¶ 27. 7 Id. ¶ 29. 6 3 (Cayman) Limited, Blue Elite, Blue II, and Atlantic Specialty Finance Limited.8 The Plaintiffs have brought claims against Tolaram for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, unjust enrichment, and tortious interference with contractual relations. Defendants Blue Elite, Blue II, Solow, Lynch, and Tolaram (together, the “12(b)(2) Defendants”) have moved to dismiss this action for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Chancery Court Rule 12(b)(2).9 In Hart Holding Co. Inc. v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc.,10 this Court held that a plaintiff “may not ordinarily be precluded from reasonable discovery in aid of mounting [proof that a defendant is subject to the jurisdiction of the court],” and consequently, discovery to establish personal jurisdiction is unwarranted “[o]nly where the facts alleged in the complaint make any claim of personal jurisdiction over defendant frivolous.”11 Here, the Plaintiffs have alleged sufficient facts to make a non-frivolous claim to this Court’s personal jurisdiction over the 12(b)(2) Defendants. Therefore, the Plaintiffs are permitted to undertake jurisdictional discovery regarding the 12(b)(2) Defendants. I will hold the 12(b)(2) Defendants’ 8 Id. ¶ 30. Ch. Ct. R. 12(b)(2). 10 593 A.2d 535 (Del. Ch. 1991). 11 Id. at 539. 9 4 respective Motions to Dismiss—and all other pending Motions to Dismiss in this matter—in abeyance for the duration of such discovery. To the extent the foregoing requires an Order to take effect, IT IS SO ORDERED. Sincerely, /s/ Sam Glasscock III Sam Glasscock III 5

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.