Posley v. Posley
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOHN W. NOBLE VICE CHANCELLOR 417 SOUTH STATE STREET DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 TELEPHONE: (302) 739-4397 FACSIMILE: (302) 739-6179 June 6, 2012 Glynis Gibson, Esquire Glynis Gibson, P.A. 34 The Green, Suite G Dover, DE 19901 Re: Alexander W. Funk, Esquire Curley & Rodriguez, LLC 250 Beiser Boulevard, Suite 202 Dover, DE 19904 Posley v. Posley C.A. No. 6803-VCN Date Submitted: April 4, 2012 Dear Counsel: 1 for matters generally arising out of their , inter alia, a constructive trust over the assets that Casper has acquired since 1989 and a declaration of the validity of their marriage to allow Family Court to divide their assets and to allow her to seek military benefits, Social Security benefits, and other entitlements to which she may be entitled through Casper. 1 First names are used for convenience only. Posley v. Posley C.A. No. 6803-VCN June 6, 2012 Page 2 Jacqueline and Casper went through a marriage ceremony in New Jersey on December 6, previous spouse was not yet final then; that, of course, calls into question the validity of their marriage.2 Casper has moved to dismiss this action under Court of Chancery Rule 12(b)(1), lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Family Court generally provides married couples with an adequate remedy at law, even though a substantial portion of its relief may be considered ability to provide an adequate remedy at law typically deprives this Court of Jacqueline argues that an invalid marriage which theirs may be because was not final at the time of their marriage ceremony precludes the Family Court from exercising jurisdiction over the various disputes. If so, she argues, it follows that she lacks an adequate remedy at law and, therefore, this Court would have jurisdiction. 2 Jacqueline brought an action in New Jersey seeking to validate the marriage; that action was dismissed for lack of subject matter and personal jurisdiction. See for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Ex. C. Posley v. Posley C.A. No. 6803-VCN June 6, 2012 Page 3 Casper has filed in Family Court for an annulment and other relief.3 Jacqueline has also joined issue there and asks the Family Court to exercise equitably dividing, distributing, and assigning the marital property, 4 relief that parallels the relief which she seeks here. If Family Court concludes that it has jurisdiction over the matters which Casper and Jacqueline have raised there, it makes little sense for those issues to be litigated in this venue as well. Indeed, if the Family Court does have jurisdiction, it would seem that it would be providing an adequate remedy at law and, thus, deprive this Court of any subject matter jurisdiction. Similarly, it makes little sense for this Court and for the Family Court both to address the question of jurisdiction. Thus, the Court will defer to the Family Court to resolve, at least initially, the jurisdictional question. That results in a stay of this action in favor of the pending Family Court action. 3 4 Id. Ex. D. Id. Ex. E. Posley v. Posley C.A. No. 6803-VCN June 6, 2012 Page 4 Counsel are requested to provide a report on the status of the related proceedings in the Family Court within sixty days of the date of this letter. IT IS SO ORDERED. Very truly yours, /s/ John W. Noble JWN/cap cc: Register in Chancery-K
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
